Tsarin Cikin Gida na Kamfanonin Crypto Daban-daban

Fitaccen Jensen Huang, babban daraktan NVIDIA mai hangen nesa, ya zama wani babban jigo a fannin gudanarwa na zamani ba kawai don son sa na sanya rigunan fata ba, har ma don sabon salon sa na tsarin kamfani wanda ya yi nasara sosai. An san shi da kin amfani da matakan manajoji na tsakiya wadanda ke kawo cikas a yawancin manyan kamfanoni na Fortune 500, wadanda yake gani a matsayin abubuwan da ke hana saurin kirkire-kirkire. An nakalto Huang yana bayanin falsafarsa, inda ya ce yana kokarin rage jan kafa na ofis (bureaucracy) yadda ya kamata domin tabbatar da cewa bayanan suna gudana cikin tsafta, sauri, kuma ba tare da an tace su ba.

An ce yana da ma'aikata sama da hamsin da ke kai rahoto kai tsaye gare shi, adadin da zai iya sa yawancin shugabannin kamfanoni su fadi su mutu saboda bugun zuciya, amma shi yana kallon hakan a matsayin wani tsari na ganganci: yana son samun bayanai kai tsaye daga tushen kungiyarsa ba tare da an tace su ko an karkatar da su ba kafin su isa gare shi. Yana ganin babu wani aiki da ya yi kankanta, kuma tsarin gudanarwa maras matakai (flat structure) yana nufin sauri — wanda shi ne kadai abin da ke da kima a fannin fasaha.

Ba ya yin tarurruka na mutum biyu kacal (one-on-one). Wannan yana sa kowa ya sami bayani iri daya kuma babu abin da aka boye a asirce, wanda hakan ke kawar da siyasar ofis, ko kuma wani ya mallaki dukkan bayanai don kansa. An san Huang da zama tare da dalibai masu koyon aiki (interns) a wurin cin abinci kuma yana amsa sakonnin imel da gajerun kalamai masu ma'ana, salon da ba a saba gani ba daga shugaban kamfani mai darajar tiriliyan daloli. Wannan "gaskiya ta ilimi" (intellectual honesty), kamar yadda yake kira, tana fifita gaskiya fiye da matsayi.

Wannan "daidaita" matsayi (flattening of hierarchy) wani abu ne da ya yi daidai da duniyar kudin intanet (cryptocurrency), inda manufar fasahar ta ginu ne a kan raba iko (decentralization), cire tsaka-tsaki (disintermediation), da kuma amfani da lambobin kwamfuta (code) maimakon matakan kamfani.

Amma tsarin cikin gida na kasuwancin crypto sun bambanta sosai da juna, tun daga hargitsatstsen rashin tsari zuwa tsarin soja na mataki-mataki, kuma idan aka kwatanta da manyan kamfanoni na gargajiya kamar Microsoft ko Coca-Cola, hakan yana bayyana bambance-bambance masu ban mamaki game da yadda mutane ke tattaunawa da hada kai daga sassa daban-daban na duniya don samar da kima a wannan zamanin na dijital.

CEXs da Gungun Binance

Mafi mahimmancin mataki a tsarin crypto shi ne musayar kudi ta tsakiya (centralized exchange), kuma Binance ya yi fice a matsayin misali cikakke na kamfanin "crypto" na zamani. Na wani lokaci, Binance ma ya yi aiki a karkashin wata falsafa mai tsauri fiye da ta NVIDIA — ya bayyana cewa ba shi da babban ofishin gudanarwa (headquarters) ko kadan. A kan wannan tafarki, shahararren wanda ya kafa Binance, Changpeng Zhao, ya taba fadin cewa ofishinsa shi ne "duk inda na zauna" a matsayin kin amincewa da ra'ayin Westphalia na mazaunin kamfani.

Wannan tsarin na gaggawa da rashin mazauni ya ba Binance damar yin aiki da gudu mai tsanani, inda ya tsere wa masu kula da dokoki da kuma abokan fafatawa, yana fitar da sabbin ayyuka da sanya sabbin tokens yayin da wasu ke shagaltuwa da cike takardu. Ma'aikatansu sun bazu a sassa daban-daban na duniya, suna aiki a lokuta daban-daban ta hanyar da ta kauce wa al'adar aikin ofis na safe zuwa yamma (9-to-5) baki daya. Tazarar tana da girma idan muka kwatanta hakan da kamfani kamar Coca-Cola.

Coca-Cola abin mamaki ne ta fuskar tsarin sufuri da rarraba kaya (logistics) da kuma tsarin kamfani na yanki. Yana da babban ofishin gudanarwa na zahiri a Atlanta, amma yana gudanar da dukkan ayyukansa ne ta hanyar tsarin soja na rassan yankuna da abokan huldar kwalba. Kowane mataki a Coca-Cola yana biyo ta hanyar ka'idoji don tabbatar da cewa dandanon Coke a Nairobi daya yake da na New York. Binance a shekarunsa na farko akasin haka yake; ya kasance gungun duniya ne.

Yayin da Coca-Cola ke da shekaru da dama na kayan aiki na zahiri da yarjejeniyoyin shari'a, Binance ya gina kansa ne a kan saba na gajimare (cloud servers) da kungiyoyin aiki daga nesa wadanda ke hade ta rukunonin Telegram da kiran Zoom.

Sun yi amfani da rundunar masu sa kai, waɗanda ake kira “Binance Angels,” don gudanar da al'ummomin gida, wanda babu wani kamfani na gargajiya mai rundunonin masu tallace-tallace da ake biya — akasin haka: Coca-Cola — da zai iya samun ƙarfin halin aiwatarwa.

Fa'idar tsarin Binance ita ce saurin shiga kasuwa da mamaye ta wanda ba a taɓa ganin irinsa ba - sun ba kowa mamaki, sun ƙaddamar da ayyuka a sabbin kasuwanni, ba tare da damuwa da abubuwa masu gajiyarwa ba - kamar gina ofis tukuna. Sai dai kuma, rashin amfanin hakan ya bayyana lokacin da gwamnatoci suka sa baki. Ba su da wani “makogwaro” na zahiri da za a shake wanda masu kula da dokoki suka saba da shi, kuma hakan ya sa su fushi, wanda a ƙarshe ya kai su ga takaddamar shari'a a ƙasashe da dama. A gefe guda kuma, tsayayyen tsarin Coca-Cola yana sa ta yin jinkiri wajen sauya alƙibla — ba za ka ga Coke ta fara sayar da takalman gudu ba farat ɗaya a mako mai zuwa — amma hakan yana nufin tana da juriya sosai kuma tana bin dokoki yadda ya kamata. Binance, a nata ɓangaren, ta zama dole ta “girma” kuma ta samar da tsare-tsaren kamfani na gargajiya don tsira, wanda hakan ke nuna cewa watakila rashin tsari gaba ɗaya yana da iyaka idan aka zo batun mu'amala da zahirin duniya.

Tsarin Gidauniya (Foundation Model): Ethereum

A ɗayan ɓangaren kuma, akwai abin da muke kira tsarin Gidauniya (Foundation model), wanda Ethereum ne babban misali da aka fi sani. Gidauniyar Ethereum ba wata ƙungiya ce da babban jami'i (CEO) ke jagoranta ba, a'a, ƙungiya ce ta kulawa da aka samar don reno, ba don bayar da umarni ba. Vitalik Buterin shi ne wanda ya kafa ta kuma jagora ne na ruhu, amma ba zai iya kawai ya ba da umarnin canje-canje a hanyar sadarwar (network) ba. Zai iya ba da shawara ne kawai.

Wannan wani bambanci ne mai ban sha'awa idan aka kwatanta da kamfani kamar Microsoft, musamman a zamanin Bill Gates ko Steve Ballmer. Microsoft tsari ne na bayar da umarni da iko.

Lokacin da Shugaba (CEO) ya ce “muna dogara ne ga gajimare (cloud)” sai kwatsam dukkan kamfanin ya koma amfani da Azure, a karkata albarkatu sannan masu adawa su tsinci kansu a cikin duhu. Tsarin cikin gida an inganta shi ne don samun saurin aiwatarwa.

A cikin Ethereum, “kamfanin” ya fi kama da wata sassaukar kungiya ce ta masu bincike, masu samar da manhajoji (kamar kungiyoyin da ke bayan Geth, Nethermind da Besu) da kuma mambobin al’umma. Gidauniyar (Foundation) tana ba da tallafi kuma tana hada mutane wuri guda, amma ba ta ba da umarni ba. Idan Microsoft rundunar sojoji ce, to Ethereum kungiyar masu aikin lambu ce ko kuma hadakar masana kimiyya. Tsarin Ethereum an yi shi ne don tabbatar da rashin nuna bangaranci na tsarin (protocol neutrality) da kuma rarraba iko (decentralization), wanda shi ne babban darajarsa.

Akasin haka kuma shi ne cewa yanke shawara na iya yin jinkiri sosai. Sabuntawa (upgrades) da babban kamfanin fasaha mai iko guda zai iya fitarwa a cikin watanni shida, zai iya daukar Ethereum shekaru uku ana muhawara, gwaji, da gina matsaya guda. Microsoft na iya tura sabuntawar Windows ga miliyoyin masu amfani a cikin dare daya. Ethereum ba zai iya "tilasta" kowa ya sabunta kumburinsa (node) ba; dole ne a gamsar da su cewa sabuntawar tana da amfani.

Hadin gwiwa don “Merge” (Hadewa) wanda ya sauya Ethereum zuwa PoS ya bukaci daruruwan kiran tattaunawa a bayyane da kuma hadin kai da ba a taba ganin irinsa ba tsakanin kungiyoyi daban-daban – wani nau’i ne na gudanar da aiki ba tare da tsakiya ba wanda ba zai taba yiwuwa a yi tunaninsa ba a duniyar Windows mai tsarin bunkasa manhaja a asirce. Wannan rashin sauri na tsari wani siffa ce ba wai matsala ba ga blockchain, amma yana sanya lamura wahala ga duk wanda ya saba da saurin aiwatarwa na kamfanoni masu tsarin iko daga sama zuwa kasa.

Sakamakon Gudanarwar DAO

Sannan akwai Kungiyoyi Masu Zaman Kansu Masu Iko (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations), ko DAOs, wani nau’i ne na fadada fasahar kyamar tsarin mulki (bureaucracy) irin ta Jensen Huang. Tare da DAO kamar Uniswap ko MakerDAO, a ka’ida ba ka da shugabanni. Muna magana ne kan shawarwarin da masu rike da lambobi (token holders) ke yankewa ta hanyar kada kuri’a kan shawarwari, wani nau’i ne na dimokuradiyyar kamfani kai tsaye. Gwada wannan da McDonald’s.

McDonald’s na ɗaya daga cikin manyan cibiyoyi mafi nasara a kowane lokaci — an kafa ta ne bisa tsarin matsayi (hierarchy) da daidaiton aiki (standardization).

Mai lasisin gudanar da kasuwancin kamfanin (franchisee) ba zai iya tashi kawai wata rana ya yanke shawarar sayar da sushi ba; tsarin matsayi na kamfanin ba zai yarda da hakan ba domin kiyaye martabar alamar kasuwancin. A cikin DAO, a ka’idance al’umma za su iya jefa ƙuri’a don yin komai. Idan al’ummar MakerDAO suka jefa ƙuri’ar sanya asusunsu (treasury) a cikin kadarorin zahiri na duniya ko kuma canza ma’aunan haɗari (risk parameters) na tsarin (protocol), za su yi hakan kuma lambobin kwamfuta (code) za su aiwatar da nufin abin da aka jefa wa ƙuri’a.

Tsarin na tafiya ne ta hanyar lissafin kwamfuta (algorithmic). Dokokin mu’amala an sanya su ne a cikin lambobin kwamfuta — kwangiloli masu basira (smart contracts) — maimakon littattafan jagorar ma’aikata. Wannan sassauƙan tsarin gine-gine yana ba da gaskiya da bayyana gaskiya (transparency) mara misaltuwa. Kuna ganin kowane dala na asusun ajiyar, da kuma kowace ƙuri’ar da aka jefa, abin da ba zai yiwu ba a cikin dakin taron sirri na McDonald’s inda ake yanke shawara a bayan kofofin da aka rufe.

Amma rashin amfanin DAO shi ne sau da yawa ana samun “danniya na masu rinjaye” ko kuma kawai gajiyar masu jefa ƙuri'a. A McDonald’s, ana biyan manyan jami’ai miliyoyin daloli don yanke shawara masu wahala. Game da DAO, idan babu al’umma mai ilimi da himma, ƙungiya za ta iya rasa alkibla ko kuma manyan masu hannun jari (whales) su mamaye ta, waɗanda ke yanke shawara don amfanin kansu maimakon amfanin tsarin (protocol). Abin mamaki shi ne, rashin tsarin mulki na ofis (bureaucracy) na iya haifar da wani nau’in tsarin mulkin daban; inda tarukan gudanarwa na al’umma ba sa ƙarewa, muhawarar dandalin tattaunawa ba ta taɓa samun matsaya, kuma ana ta tsara shawarwari (proposals) ba tare da an ɗauki mataki ba: ƙungiyar da ta shanye a cikin yanayin nazari mara iyaka.

Wannan ya haifar da bayyanar kwararrun “Wakilai” (Delegates) — ƙungiyoyi kamar kulab ɗin jami'o'i, ko kamfanonin zuba jari waɗanda aka ba su ikon jefa ƙuri'a don yanke shawara mai ma'ana — ta haka aka sake dawo da wani nau'i na dimokuradiyyar wakilci a cikin wannan tsari marar matsayi. Mun ma fara ganin wasu tsare-tsaren gudanarwa masu rassa biyu masu ban sha'awa a cikin DAOs – misali kamar “Token House” da “Citizens’ House” na Optimism, waɗanda ke da nufin daidaita ikon masu kuɗi na ƙada ƙuri'a da tsabar kuɗi (coin-voting) da kuma gudanarwa bisa shaidar asali. Wannan wani gwaji ne mai ban sha'awa na gina ƙasa ta dijital, wanda ba shi da misali a wurare kamar McDonald’s, wanda ba komai ba ne illa mulkin kama-karya na masu hannun jari.

Ƙungiyoyi Masu Ɓoyayyen Suna (Pseudonymous Teams)

Tsarin ƙungiyoyin masu haɓakawa (dev teams) a harkar crypto ya sha bamban sosai da fasahar gargajiya, musamman ta fuskar shaidar asali. Yawancin sauran ayyukan DeFi suna aiki ne da ƙungiyoyin da gaba ɗayansu ke amfani da ɓoyayyen suna. Me zai faru idan dukkan waɗancan hotunan katun na ɓoye a Apple su ma injiniyoyi ne? An san Apple da tsananin sirri da tsarin sassa — ƙila wata ƙungiya ba ta san abin da wata ke yi ba har sai an ƙaddamar da samfuri, ƙoƙari ne na hana fallasa sirri. Wannan yana kiyaye "sihirin" a ciki sannan yana kare mallakar fasaha (IP).

Sabanin haka, SushiSwap ko Yearn Finance na iya zama ayyukan da ake ginawa a idon jama'a. Lambar tsarin (code) buɗaɗɗe ce (open source), taswirar aiki (roadmap) tana kan dandalin tattaunawa, sannan ana iya sanin masu haɓakawa kawai da sunaye kamar “Chef Nomi” ko “Banteg.” Wannan bayyananniyar tana sa mutane su amince a cikin muhallin da ba ya buƙatar amincewa (trustless environment). Masu amfani ba sai sun amince da sunan Apple ko fuskar Tim Cook ba; suna duba lambar tsarin ne a GitHub.

Tsarin cikin gida a nan galibi ya fi ginuwa ne bisa cancanta (meritocratic) fiye da yadda zai iya zama da amfani — idan ka samar da lamba mai kyau, za a ɗauke ka aiki cikin sauri kamar wanda ya fito daga shahararriyar jami'a, tare da gargaɗin cewa takardar neman aikinka (resume) ba ita ce muhimmiya ba, sannan inda kake a duniya ba shi da tasiri. Fa'idodin wannan damar su ne, hazaka na iya fitowa daga ko'ina a kowane lokaci. Ƙwararren mai haɓakawa a ƙauye na iya ba da gudummawa daidai da mai haɓakawa da ke Silicon Valley. Rashin amfanin shi ne, ba tare da yarjejeniyar shari'a da sassan kula da ma'aikata (HR) ba, “rug pulls” ko rikicin cikin gida na iya ruguza aiki cikin dare ɗaya.

Tsauraran tsare-tsaren ma'aikata na Apple suna hana injiniya guduwa da baitulmalin kamfanin ko lalata hajarsu ba tare da fuskantar hukunci na shari'a ba; a cikin ƙungiyar crypto ta ɓoye suna, kodi da kuma suna ne kawai matakan kariya.

Kamfanonin "Labs" Masu Haɗaɗɗen Tsari

Sannan akwai samfura masu haɗaɗɗen tsari da ke bayyana a wannan fanni, inda kamfanoni ke ƙoƙarin daidaita ingancin gudanarwa na kamfani da akidun crypto. Labs suna kawo sabbin ƙungiyoyi cikin sauri don tura kuɗi ko gina kayayyakin kuɗi. Kwatanta wannan da kamfani kamar Ava Labs (Avalanche) ko Solana Labs, waɗanda ke aiki kamar wani sabon kamfani mai saurin girma kamar Uber ko Airbnb. Suna da shugabanni (CEOs), ofisoshi, raba hannun jari, da sassa tsayayyu, amma babban hajarsu ita ce hanyar sadarwa da ba ta da cibiya guda (decentralized network) wadda ba su mallaka gaba ɗaya ba. Dole ne su yi taka-tsantsan kamar mai tafiya a kan igiya.

Uber ta mallaki manhajarta gaba ɗaya, idan suna son gabatar da wani tsarin farashi daban, suna yin hakan. Solana Labs ne suka gina manhajar, amma dubban masu tabbatar da ma'amaloli (validators) masu zaman kansu da ke ko'ina a duniya ne ke tafiyar da hanyar sadarwar. Wannan yana haifar da wani takun-saka na cikin gida inda kamfanin ke bukatar ya yi aiki kamar jagora amma ya nuna kamar shi "ɗaya ne daga cikin mahalarta" saboda tsoron fuskantar shari'a. Wannan wata rawa ce ta neman tasiri, ba iko ba.

A kamfani na al'ada, iko a bayyane yake. A kamfanin "Labs" na crypto, iko mai laushi ne. Dole ne su amince cewa suna da kwararrun injiniyoyi da mafi yawan albarkatu a kan ragamar aiki, ba wai bayar da umarni ba. Wannan yana bukatar babban matakin ƙwarewa da al'adar jan hankali kamar yadda Jensen Huang yake tafiyar da NVIDIA — kusa da asalin fasahar.

Baitulmali da Masu Amfani na Gaske

Wasu abubuwan sha'awa na kamanceceniya a tsari suna cikin yadda kamfanoni ke tsara baitulmalinsu domin sarrafa kuɗin gudanarwa da kasada yadda ya kamata. Dubi MicroStrategy a ƙarƙashin Michael Saylor idan aka kwatanta da Apple.

Don haka Apple tana zaune ne a kan tarin kuɗaɗe da takardun hannun jari masu daraja waɗanda ba ta san abin da za ta yi da su ba, ƙarƙashin kulawar sashen baitulmali mai ra'ayin mazan jiya wajen kiyaye babban jari da kuma sake sayen hannun jari akai-akai. Tsarin an yi shi ne don ya zama ginshiƙin tabbatawa da kwanciyar hankali.

MicroStrategy, wadda kamfanin software ce kawai a suna, ta sauya dukkan tsarin kamfaninta don ya zama hanyar sayen Bitcoin kawai. Saylor ya mayar da baitulmali ya zama injin dabarun kamfanin, inda yake rance don sayen kadarori masu saurin canjin daraja (volatile assets). Wannan wani juye-juyen tsari ne inda "asusun banki" na kamfanin ya zama shi ne ainihin samfurin da ake sayarwa. Wannan shi ne crypto. A tsakanin ƙungiyoyin DAO da dama, "Baitulmali" (Treasury) shi ne mafi mahimmancin sashe, ko don alheri ko akasin haka, kuma mambobin al'umma suna fafatawa a kan yadda za a kashe kuɗin.

Wannan ya bambanta sosai da tsarin gudanarwar kamfanoni na gargajiya, inda masu hannun jari ba safai suke shiga cikin harkokin yau da kullum na sarrafa kuɗaɗen kamfani ba. Tsarin kamfani kamar Ripple shi ma yana ba da kwatanci mai ban sha'awa da tsarin banki na gargajiya – misali SWIFT. SWIFT haɗaka ce ta mambobi kuma tana da jinkiri, tana dogara ne ga yarjejeniya (consensus), kuma tana da tsauraran matakai na ofis (bureaucratic). Ripple kamfani ne na fasaha mai zaman kansa wanda ya ƙirƙiri samfurin da bankuna ke amfani da shi. Yana da tsari irin na mai sayar da software kamar Oracle amma yana nuna kamar zai maye gurbin tsarin haɗaka na gargajiya. Wannan takaddama tsakanin kasancewa mai sayarwa na bai-ɗaya (centralised vendor) yayin ƙirƙirar kundin adana bayanai na fili wanda ba shi da uwar gida (open, decentralised ledger) ita ce jigon asalin Ripple da kuma sarƙaƙiyar shari'a da ta kewaye shi.

Kamfanonin VC na gargajiya kamar Sequoia ko Benchmark a tarihi sun kasance haɗaka ne waɗanda ke ba da kuɗi da kuma shawarwari ga hukumar gudanarwa.

Kamfanonin da suka kware a harkar crypto kamar a16z crypto sun samar da manyan "kungiyoyin gudanarwa" na cikin gida — wadanda ke daukar injiniyoyi, masu binciken tsaro (security auditors), da lauyoyi don yin aiki a kan tsare-tsaren (protocols) da suka zuba jari a kai. Wannan tsarin na “Service-as-a-VC” yana daukar hanyoyin sadarwa na crypto ba a matsayin kamfanonin da za a zuba jari a cikinsu kawai ba, face a matsayin tsarin rayuwar fasaha (ecosystems) wadanda dole ne ka shiga cikinsu. Wannan ya sha bamban sosai da tsohon tsarin kudi na rubuta cek (check-writing) ba tare da sa hannu ba.

Masu Tara Ayyuka (Aggregators) a Aikace

Saboda abokan ciniki suna bi ta wannan sarkakkiyar hanyar na tsarin kamfanoni daban-daban, dole ne su fuskanci muhimman bangarori na amfani da hanyoyin sadarwar da wadannan kamfanoni suka gina. A cikin hanyar sadarwa ta TRON, misali daya shi ne tsarin fasaha na abubuwan da ake bukata don gudanarwa kamar su Energy da Bandwidth. Duk da cewa tattaunawa kan tsarin shugabanci (governance) tana da kyau, talakan mai amfani kawai yana son tura kudi ne — ba tare da ya kashe kudi mai yawa ba.

Kuma a nan ne hakikanin yanayin tsarin (ecosystem) yake bayyana – wato hayar TRON Energy don rage tsadar kudi. Dole ne POC ya kasance wanda ba ya bukatar amincewar juna (trustless). Ba damuwar mai amfani ba ne ko yana mu'amala da DApp din da yake so, ko tura USDT idan tsarin DAO ne, ko kuma tsarin Gidauniya (Foundation) – idan aka duba ta fuskar tsadar kudi. Saukin farashin TRON Energy shi ne babban jigo ga jin dadin mai amfani kuma yana hada babban tsarin blockchain da walat din mai amfani. Bayanai daga dandalin eSoV na yanar gizo sun nuna dalilin da ya sa bukatar rassan masana'antu ta karu: koda kuwa akwai wasu hanyoyin samun kudi da jari, amfanin ya fi kasancewa a tunani kawai ga talakan mai amfani wanda kawai yake son tura kudi zuwa kasashen waje.

Wannan shi ne inda mai samar da hidima kamar Netts TRON Energy Market yake shigowa. Netts yana ba da farashi sama da ashirin a take daga masu samar da makamashi (energy) daban-daban, masu amfani za su iya samun mafi kyawun farashi don hayar TRON Energy a kowane lokaci.

Ganin cewa kasuwar makamashi a cikin hanyar sadarwa ta TRON tana gudanar da wakilci (delegations) fiye da miliyan 1.72 a kowace rana, a bayyane yake cewa akwai buƙatar hada-hadar kuɗi mai rahusa.

Netts yana ba masu amfani damar adana kusan kashi 90 cikin ɗari na kuɗin hada-hadar kuɗi idan aka kwatanta da ƙone TRX kai tsaye, sannan yana samar da sauƙin amfani ga masu amfani don neman masu samarwa, duba jadawalin farashi, da yin hayar makamashi nan take. Don hada-hadar kasuwancin intanet guda ɗaya ko amfani da dApp, ƴan kobo kaɗan sun isa. Game da biyan kuɗi na lokaci ɗaya/manhajojin tattalin arziki ko dApps masu yawan hada-hada, Netts yana hasashen sakamako ta amfani da bayanan kasuwa don samar da ƙarin ragi. Kuna iya ganin nawa ne kuɗin da ake biya yayin amfani da blockchain. Sarƙaƙiyar cikin gida ta Blockchain za ta ɓace kuma kowa zai sami fa'ida. Netts yana ba ku lada kamar tsarin cashback a rayuwarku ta yau da kullum. Kashe kaɗan don samun ƙari. Muna tattara bayanai daga blockchains daban-daban na biyan kuɗi. Kuna biyan ƙasa da farashin kasuwa na yanzu.