Modular Blockchains: Mafarkin Lego ko Matsalar Haɗin Kan Tsari?

Modular kalma ce mai daɗin ji amma mai cike da shakku. Tana kawo tunanin bulolin Lego, ɗakunan karatu na software da aka tsara da kyau, da kayan ɗaki da ake kawowa a cikin akwatuna tare da jakar ƙusoshi a gefe. Modularity na nuna sassauƙa, zamani, da kuma wani matsayi na ƙawa, ba kamar wani ƙaton injin da ba ya lalacewa inda kowane ƙarfe ke haɗe da na gaba ta hanyar waldawa ba. Wannan shine dalilin da ya sa kalmar ta sami mazauninta a tallan crypto. Modular blockchain abu ne da ya kamata ya dace a zuciyar mutum - aiwatarwa (execution) a nan, daidaitawa (settlement) a can, samar da bayanai (data availability) a ƙasa, wani bridge, ɗan ɓoyayyen bayanin zero-knowledge, kuma nan da nan duka tsarin ya fi monolith mai haɗe komai inganci.

Duk wanda ya taɓa ƙoƙarin haɗa wani abu na modular ya san cewa kyawun sau da yawa yana cikin yaudara ne. Canza saitin bulolin Lego da wani na iya zama abin takaici idan sabbin bulolin ba su da ƙarfi kamar tsofaffin. Yanzu ka yi tunanin cewa a maimakon bulolin roba da ƙusoshi kana da zato na settlement, tsarin rollup, kwangilolin bridge, kwamitocin data-availability, alamomin mulki (governance tokens), jadawalin masu zuba jari, binciken waje (external audits), da layukan lambobi dubu biyar na LLM-initialized code da babu wanda ke karantawa saboda lokacin ƙaddamarwa ya kusa.

Abubuwa na iya zama masu kyau idan an yi su daidai. Wannan gaskiya mai sauƙi ita ce babban makasudin tsarin modular blockchain. Ba sihiri ba ne, ba ya alƙawarin magance matsaloli da kansa; kawai yana nuna cewa za a iya tura sarƙaƙiyar wani wuri. Ya rage ga masu aiwatarwa su tabbatar da cewa sabuwar sarƙaƙiyar da aka rarraba za a iya sarrafa ta. Tsarin modular da aka tsara da kyau na iya ware wani ɓangare kuma ya yi aikinsa da kyau fiye da yadda tsarin monolithic zai yi. Hakanan zai iya haifar da filin kai hari (attack surface) mai girman gaske idan ba a tsara shi da wannan gaskiyar a zuciya ba.

Dalilin da ya sa mutane ke sha'awar modular blockchains shine saboda tsofaffin hanyoyin tsara tsarin blockchain na gargajiya sun ci karo da wasu matsaloli. Monolithic blockchain mataki ne na settlement, execution environment, hanyar cimma matsaya (consensus mechanism), da kuma matakin data-availability duk an haɗa su wuri ɗaya a cikin tsari mai ƙarfi. Tsarin gidan sarauta ne na zamanin da (Middle Ages) - mai sauƙi, mai kyau, tare da dukkan kariya a wuri ɗaya, amma yana da tsada sosai don ginawa da kiyayewa.

Settlement, execution, consensus, da data-availability duk suna da mahimmanci, amma gasar neman sararin block a tsakaninsu sau da yawa tana barin ƙaramin wuri ga aikace-aikacen da ke son yin settlement a kan chain. Dole ne masu amfani su biya abin da masu haɓakawa (developers) suka gaza ba fifiko, kuma dole ne masu haɓakawa su yi zane a kan ƙuntatawa maimakon gina fannin manhajar (application layer) da suke buri. Wannan shine dalilin da ya sa tsarin modular blockchain ke da kyau - yana yin alƙawarin raba waɗannan ayyuka da ba wa matakai na musamman damar gudanar da aikinsu fiye da yadda blockchain na bai-ɗaya zai iya.

Haɓaka masu mayar da hankali kan rollup na Ethereum sune babban misali na wannan tsarin, inda babban hanyar sadarwa ta Ethereum mainnet ke ba da settlement da tsaro yayin da aka fitar da execution environment daban a cikin nau'ikan rollups daban-daban. Haɓakar Dencun na kwanan nan, wanda ya gabatar da blobspace, wani misali ne - ya bai wa rollups damar tura bayanan su a farashi mai sauƙi, wanda hakan kuma ya sa aikace-aikacen da ke amfani da waɗannan rollups suka zama masu sauƙin kuɗi ga masu amfani.

Celestia ƙa'idar modular blockchain ce ta gwaji wacce kuma ke da nufin samar da matakin settlement daban da execution environment. Yana kama da Ethereum ta hanyoyi da yawa amma yana ƙoƙarin zama mai sauƙi da siriri - execution rollups na iya amfani da matakin data-availability ba tare da ɗaukar hanyoyin settlement da consensus na Ethereum ba. Celestia tana amfani da data-availability sampling don ba wa light nodes damar tantance cewa an buga bayanan daidai ba tare da sauke dukkan chain ɗin ba. Duk yanayin da ke kewaye da shi kuma na modular ne - tsarin rollup, matakan wallafa bayanai, da sauran kayan aikin more rayuwa an gina su daban amma suna aiki tare da tushen chain ɗin. Bukatar na nan, amma har yanzu kwanakin farko ne ga Celestia, kamar yadda yake ga sauran modular blockchains da yawa.

EigenDA mataki ne na data-availability da aka gina akan EigenLayer, wanda ke ba wa rollups na tushen Ethereum damar amfani da tsaron restaked Ether na EigenDA maimakon tsare nasu chains na data-availability. Avail, tsohon aikin Polygon da ya zama matakin data-availability mai zaman kansa, wani mai fafatawa ne wanda ke yin alƙawarin data availability mara nuna bambancin chain tare da tantancewar light-client da haɗin gwiwa (interoperability). Waɗannan duk ra'ayoyi ne masu ban sha'awa waɗanda ke da nufin raba data availability daga settlement da execution, suna barin rollups su zama sirara kuma na musamman.

Ga masu haɓakawa, jan hankalin modular blockchains a bayyane yake. Maimakon gina komai daga farko, za su iya amfani da wani tsari ko saitin shahararrun sassan modular don gina chain ɗin su. OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit, ZK Stack, Polygon CDK, Agglayer CDK, Rollkit, da kuma samfuran rollup-as-a-service daban-daban duk suna ba wa masu haɓakawa damar gina execution environment da suke so yayin da suka dogara da kyakkyawan tsaro da aka kafa. Maimakon ƙaddamar da cikakken matakin settlement tare da masu tabbatarwa (validators), bridge, hanyar consensus, da saitin smart contracts, ƙungiya na iya ƙaddamar da optimistic ko zk-rollup tare da amintaccen saiti, kuma a gama da shi a cikin 'yan makonni. Maimakon gina matakin data-availability, rollup na iya yin hayan wuri a Ethereum ko a wani chain ta hanyar EigenDA ko Celestia.

Ga masu amfani, fa'idodin sun fi wuyar ganewa. Aikace-aikacen tushen rollup mai sauƙi ya fi babu, amma ainihin alƙawarin modular blockchains shine kwarewa a fanni na musamman. Ana iya inganta matakan settlement da data-availability don sauƙi da tsaro, execution rollups na iya amfani da kayan aikin da tsarin da suka zaɓa ya bayar, kuma takamaiman blockchains na aikace-aikace na iya samar da mu'amaloli masu sauƙin kuɗi da ingantaccen UX fiye da na gama-gari. Wannan duka abu ne na ka'ida, amma mafi kyawun tayin da yake bayarwa ga masu haɓakawa da masu amfani kuma barazana ce - barazana ga rinjayen monolithic blockchains.

Matsalar Sulke (Armor Problem)

Matsalar tana farawa ne lokacin da tsarin modular ya daina zama aikin gine-gine ya zama na ado da son rai. Mutum ba ya zama cikin aminci kawai don zane-zanensa suna da ƙarin akwatuna. A kowane iyaka tsakanin akwatuna dole ne a sami zato, kowane saƙo tsakanin matakai dole ne a bincika shi, kowane bridge an tsara shi da tsarin amana (trust model), kowane sequencer ana bincika aikinsa, kowane matakin data availability ana bincikar sa don tabbatar da sampling na gaskiya ko ma'aikata, kowace hanyar haɓakawa tana ƙarƙashin mulki (governance), kowane dogaro na waje abu ne da zai iya lalacewa yayin da manhajar ke da'awar tana da aminci.

Masu satar fasaha na Crypto sun daɗe da gano cewa wuri mafi kyau don kai hari a kan tsari ba a cikinsa ba ne, amma a gaɓoɓinsa: bridge, oracle, saitin validator, maɓallin haɓakawa, mai sanya hannu a wajen chain (off-chain signer), da ƙaramar kwangilar taimako da babu wanda ya yi tunanin za ta yi tasiri. Dubi mummunar lalacewar maɓallin validator na Ronin, zamban wrapping na Wormhole, ko kuma satar cire kuɗi ta hanyar bridge na Nomad - da biliyoyin kuɗi da aka sace a waɗannan abubuwan da suka faru. An rage farashin kowannensu ta hanyar tsari, amma an yi ɓarnar a wurin da tsaro ya fi ƙanƙanta: mafi raunin mahaɗi a cikin chain.

A nan ne sulken zamanin da ya shigo. An taɓa haɗa kayan ƙarfe da kwanoni da fata da matashi da sauran nau'ikan kariya tare a cikin wani dinki domin ba da cikakkiyar damar motsi yayin da ake ba da ingantaccen tsaro. Za a iya maye gurbin kowane mataki, inganta shi, gyara shi - amma mahaɗan tsakanin nau'ikan sulke daban-daban a koyaushe wurare ne masu rauni, waɗanda maƙiya masu ƙudiri ke amfani da su. Ba mafi raunin sarƙa ɗaya ba ce ta gama da mayakan dawakai, amma bel ɗin su ne. Hammata, hular kwano, maraina, gwiwoyi, gwiwar hannu - duk waɗannan wuraren ba a tsara su don tunkude mashi ba, amma sun zama tabbatattun wuraren shiga na hari.

Ci gaban da aka samu a fannin tsara sulke daga baya ya nemi rage waɗannan wurare masu rauni ta hanyar sanya rigar gaba ɗaya ta fi haɗe: rigar ƙarfe ta cuirass, hular kwano mai rufewa, ƙarin kwanoni na dabarun tsaro da ƙarfafa mahaɗai. Babu wani abu da ba daidai ba game da tsohuwar hanyar, amma abokin gaba ba wawa ba ne, kuma ya daina auna bel ɗin jarumin. Tsarin modular yana da ƙarfi ne kawai daidai da mafi raunin dogaronsa, kuma idan aka sami ƙarin irin waɗannan abubuwan dogaro, yana yiwuwa ɗayansu zai gaza.

Wannan shine ma'aunin da dole ne a auna modular blockchains a kansa. Tsarin modular yana da fa'ida lokacin da aka gina kowane mataki don barazanar tsarin gaba ɗaya, amma yana da haɗari lokacin da sassan sa na kowane ɗaya suka zama mafi ƙasƙantar matsayin tsaro. Lokacin da wani ke ƙoƙarin kutsa sequencer ɗinka, ba kwa son a tunatar da ku cewa matakin bayananku ko settlement chain kwangilar multi-sig ce ko kuma ma'aikacin node na ɓangare na uku.

Wannan ba yana nufin cewa monolithic chains sun fi modular kyau kai tsaye ba. Blockchain ɗaya mai haɗe yana da nasa haɗarin, hanyoyin kai hari, matsalolin cunkoso, da wuraren gazawa - kalli ƙalubalen tsaro da ke ƙaruwa a Solana, Ethereum, Bitcoin, da sauran manyan ecosystems. Amma monolith yana gabatar da fili mai sauƙi don kai hari da karewa, tare da ƙananan haɗari gaba ɗaya fiye da ɗayan zaɓin. Haka kuma, tarin modular na iya ba da damar ƙarin girma (scalability), sassauƙa, da gwaji, amma hakan yana zuwa ne da tsadar ƙarin sarƙaƙiya da nauyin ƙarin zato na amana.

Matsalar Kwarewar Mai Amfani (User Experience Problem)

Raunin tsarin modular yana yawan bayyana a cikin kwarewar mai amfani (UX). Idan execution layer yana aiki da kyau amma data layer babu shi, ko sequencer ya tsaya amma settlement chain na aiki, ko an dakatar da bridging na ɗan lokaci saboda wata matsala, ta yaya ake tsammanin mai amfani zai sani? Ba shi da masaniya game da bambanci tsakanin settlement da execution ko ta yaya, kuma tabbas ba tare da bambance-bambance na dabara tsakanin tsare-tsaren data availability daban-daban da tasirinsu ga ci gaba da aiki (liveness) ba. A wurinsa, blockchain ya daina aiki, shikenan.

Matsalolin tsayawar Rollup sune babban misali na wannan matsalar. Base, ɗaya daga cikin shahararrun layer 2s na Ethereum, ya sami matsalar chain na tsawon mintuna 33 saboda matsalar sauya sequencer (failover issue). Abin farin ciki ga masu amfani da shi, kuɗaɗensu ba su zama ba za a iya shiga ba a kowane lokaci yayin faruwar lamarin, amma ya kasance darasi mai mahimmanci. Dukkanin tsarin Ethereum an gina shi ne a kan tsaron settlement a kan Ethereum, amma wannan ba yana nufin cewa tsayawar aiki ta musamman ga rollup ba ta taɓa faruwa ba.

Wani misalin kuma ana iya samunsa a cikin tsayawar Linea sequencer na kwanan nan bayan harin Velocore. A sakamakon harin, ƙungiyar Linea ta fara dakatarwa wacce ta hana cire kuɗin masu amfani. Yayin da wannan ba shakka shine mafi ƙarancin mugunta biyu bisa la'akari da yanayin, yana nuna yiwuwar haɗarin UX na tsarin modular. Dakatarwar na nufin cewa masu amfani da chain mai dacewa da Ethereum na Linea sun kasa samun damar shiga kadarorinsu, kodayake Ethereum ne ya tsare su. Ya kuma zama abin tunatarwa mai zafi cewa yawancin rollups har yanzu suna da iko na gudanarwa mai maida hankali wuri ɗaya (centralized) ko kusan hakan a kan chains ɗin su.

A halin yanzu, ɓangaren rollup yana cike da fashewar zaɓuɓɓukan data availability daban-daban. Modular blockchains daban-daban suna ba wa masu amfani da su zaɓi tsakanin masu samar da rollup-as-a-service, Celestia DA, EigenDA, Avail, Ethereum blobspace, da sauran zaɓuɓɓuka. Wasu chains, ciki har da Base, Arbitrum Nova, Linea, Scroll, da sauran su, an gina su a kan tsofaffin Ethereum settlement chains kuma suna amfani da hanyoyin magance data availability ɗin su. A halin yanzu, Optimism na shirin ƙaddamar da nasa Superchain, wanda zai haɗa OP chains da yawa a cikin matakin settlement na bai-ɗaya.

Zaɓin tsakanin waɗannan zaɓuɓɓukan ba kasafai yake bayyana a fili ba, kuma ba kasafai ake yin shi ba tare da la'akari da cikakkun bayanai na fasaha ba. A aikace, yawancin masu amfani kawai suna son mu'amalarsu ta kasance mai sauƙin kuɗi kuma mai sauri. Ba sa son damuwa game da bambance-bambance tsakanin blobs da calldata, ko layer 2 chains da settlement ɗin su a kan layer 1. Idan ya zo ga crypto UX, 'modular' sau da yawa yana nufin 'mara tsada', kuma masu sha'awar hakan suna da yawa.

A gefe guda kuma, kowane chain da aka gina a kan wani yana kawo ƙarin haɗari. Ethereum bridges sun kasance tushen hare-hare akai-akai a wannan shekara, kuma yana da kyau a ɗauka cewa matsaloli na musamman ga rollup za su biyo baya. Yawan matakan da ke tsakanin kuɗin mai amfani da settlement, yawan abubuwan da za su iya lalacewa a lokaci guda. Yayin da yanayin barazana ga tsayawar rollup za a iya cewa ba ta kai ta bridges ba, ba za a iya faɗi haka ga tsarin UX ba. Shi kansa mai amfani da ba zai lura da bambanci tsakanin Ethereum, Arbitrum Nova, Linea, ko Base ba, ba zai lura kuma ba lokacin da aka 'dakatar da ɗayan waɗannan chains saboda dalilai na tsaro'.

Ba mai amfani ɗaya kaɗai ke fuskantar sarƙaƙiyar tsarin modular ba. Tsaron smart contract ya riga ya zama ƙalubale sosai, amma duba tarin modular (auditing) kamar hawan dutse ne. Dole ne mutum ya bincika ba kawai kwangilar da aka nufa ba amma duk ƙarin code, zato, abubuwan dogaro, da kayan aikin da suka zama tsarin. Kowane ɗayan waɗannan abubuwan na iya kasawa ta hanyar da ba a tsammani ba, kuma mu'amala a tsakaninsu ba kasafai take da sauƙin fahimta ba. Mai kai hari yana buƙatar nemo rauni ɗaya kawai a cikin smart contract ɗaya ko rauni ɗaya a bridge ɗaya a cikin tsarin domin harinsa ya yi nasara.

Amsar masana'antar ga wannan ƙalubale a bayyane take - ƙarin tsauri, ingantattun kayan aiki, ingantaccen tsari. Ingantattun bridges tare da tantancewar light client. Zero knowledge proofs da threshold signatures. Rate limiting da circuit breakers. Sequencers da settlement chains masu cin gashin kansu. Tantancewa ta musamman (formal verification) da sa ido da UX da ke fuskantar mai amfani don bayyana komai ga masu amfani da suka ruɗe. Ƙoƙarin da ke a zuciyar ɓangaren modular yana haifar da ƙirƙira a kowane mataki, tun daga ƙananan matakan fasaha har zuwa saman.

Sasantawa ce, Ba Ceto Ba

Software gaba ɗaya game da sasantawa ne (tradeoffs). Wasu a bayyane suke, wasu an binne su a ƙarƙashin takardu da yaren shari'a. Wasu suna zuwa tare da kowane babban sabon abu a fannin, kamar sasantawar da ta haɗa EVM ta Ethereum. Modular blockchains ba su da bambanci, suna yin alƙawarin sassauƙa da gwaji ba tare da cire nauyin ƙarin sarƙaƙiya ba. Modular chains suna musanya sauƙin fasaha na tsarin chain guda ɗaya don samun damar ingantawa. Suna musanya garantin tsaro mai sauƙi don faɗaɗa filin kai hari. Suna musanya cunkoson matakin settlement guda ɗaya don ƙarin aiki na ƙungiya na matakan tsaro da yawa. Suna musanya 'yancin masu haɓakawa don rarraba iko (decentralization), da kuma ɗanyen damar aiki don ƙarin nauyi.

Ga wasu ƙungiyoyin, hakan ya sa su zama zaɓi a bayyane. Akwai chains na musamman don takamaiman aikace-aikace waɗanda za su ci gajiyar rashin raba matakin settlement tare da kowa, saboda aiki ko dalilai na tattalin arziki. Akwai wasannin bidiyo da manhajoji masu adana bayanan lokaci da takamaiman ladubban DeFi, chains na kamfanoni da wuraren gwaji, waɗanda duk za su iya amfani da sassauƙar tsarin modular. Akwai dukkanin tsarin halittu da ke buƙatar a gina su daga babu komai, kuma rollup tare da bayanai masu sauƙin kuɗi da aiki mai sauri hanya ce mai kyau don farawa.

Ga sauran ƙungiyoyi, sasantawar ba ta da kyau sosai. Idan aikin ba ya buƙatar nasa chain ɗin, babu ma'ana a ƙaddamar da ɗaya. Idan ƙungiyar ba ta da tabbaci game da gina bridge, ya kamata ta guji yin hakan. Idan ƙungiyar ba za ta iya ilimantar da masu amfani da ita game da haɗarin tsarin modular ba, tabbas ba za ta iya tsammanin kare abokan cinikinta ba. Idan raba iko zai kasance a koyaushe 'a nan gaba', aikin bai shirya ƙaddamarwa ba. Tsaron modular chain yana da kyau ne kawai daidai da mafi raunin wurinsa, kuma idan mafi raunin wurin shine 'alƙawarin ingantawa a nan gaba', lokaci ya yi da za a sake duba tsarin.

Darasi daga zamanin da ya shafi nan ma - sulken modular ba shi da ƙarancin ƙima a dabi'ance idan aka kwatanta da kowane irin sa. Sulken modular da ba a tsara shi da kyau ba, duk da haka, yana da sauƙin ganewa, domin sau da yawa yana barin muhimman wurare na jiki a bayyane. Haka yake ga modular blockchains - alƙawarin 'haɗin kaddarorin tsaro' ba shi da amfani idan kowane mataki na tsarin ya gaza isa, ba shi da tsaro, ko kuma ba a tabbatar da shi ba.

Mafi kyawun modular blockchains suna yarda da wannan gaskiyar kuma suna rage waɗannan haɗurran gwargwadon iko. Sun fahimci cewa tsari mai aminci da gaske yana ɓoye sarƙaƙiya a bayan kyakkyawan tsarin amfani (interface), kamar yadda sulke mai kyau ke da wuyar ganewa daga nesa. Suna taƙaita zato da iyakokin amana, suna iyakance filin kai hari, kuma suna amfani da tsarin tsaro da ke akwai inda zai yiwu. Tsarin sequencing an rarraba shi (decentralized), settlement chains an gwada su an tabbatar, bridges an tabbatar da su da light client, ana duba smart contracts a hukumance. Ana ƙara kowane ƙarin mataki ne kawai idan yana da amfani.

Mafi munin modular blockchains, a gefe guda, suna da daɗin ji fiye da yadda suke a aikace. Suna ɓoye rashin tsaron su a bayan tabbaci marar tabbas, kalaman tallan 'multi-layered', da kuma alƙawarin 'sassauƙa'. Suna ƙara sarƙaƙiya ba tare da rage haɗarin gaba ɗaya ba, suna ba da fifiko ga saurin gudu da faɗaɗa a kan tsaro. Chain da aka gina a kan wani chain ba shi da muni kai tsaye fiye da wanda ke tsaye shi kaɗai, amma koyaushe ya fi haɗari idan ƙungiyar da ke bayansa ba za ta iya bayyana dalilin hakan daidai ba. Idan mafi raunin mahaɗin aikin shine alƙawarin kawo raba iko 'wata rana', dukkan tsarin yana cikin haɗari.

Yana da Daraja ko A'a?

Modular blockchains suna ba wa masu haɓakawa dama mai ban mamaki. Idan aka yi amfani da su daidai, fa'idodinsu suna da wuyar musantawa - babban sassauƙa da gwaji, ƙananan farashi da sauƙin dubawa. Babu shakka cewa takun-saka tsakanin hanyoyin monolithic da modular zai ci gaba da bayyana fannin na shekaru masu zuwa, yayin da ɓangarorin biyu ke neman haɓaka ƙarfi da rage raunin tsarin kowannensu. Amma ko waɗannan damar za su tabbata a zahiri ya dogara ne da ƙudiri da ƙwarewar fasaha na ƙungiyoyin daban-daban.

Babu shakka Modularity yana da jan hankali. Ikon gina cikakken tsarin rayuwa daga kayan aikin da ke akwai yana da ban sha'awa sosai. Zai iya hanzarta ci gaba, rage shingen shiga, da ba da zaɓuɓɓuka daban-daban na gwaji. Optimistic rollups na Ethereum sun riga sun nuna ingancin wannan tsarin, kuma faɗin tsarin a yanzu yana ganin fashewar sabbin abubuwa.

Celestia da EigenDA, tare da Avail da Ethereum blobspace, duk a shirye suke don kawo ƙarin sassauƙar data availability ga rollup chains da ke amfani da su. OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit, Polygon's CDK da Agglayer, Linea's fork na Optimism, da sauran su da yawa duk suna aiki don sauƙaƙe matsalolin fasaha ga masu haɓakawa da ƙungiyoyi, suna ba su damar ƙaddamar da nasu chains masu dacewa da Ethereum. Dukkanin fannin yana shiga wani mataki mai ban sha'awa na ci gaba, yayin da yiwuwar fasaha ta makomar multi-chain ke ƙara bayyana a fili.

Koyaya, irin wannan ƙarfin yana haifar da kyakkyawan fata a wasu wurare. Ga wasu ayyukan, jan hankalin tsarin monolithic yana da wuyar watsi da shi. Integrated chains suna da fa'idodi na asali, suna ba da ƙarin sauƙi da tsaro yayin da suka fi dacewa da dorewa na dogon lokaci. Masu amfani da irin waɗannan dandamali ba su da yuwuwar ruɗewa ko takaici da bayanan fasaha na tsarin modular. Wuri guda mai aminci kuma mai ƙwazo sau da yawa ya fi dacewa fiye da yanayin da ke da ƙarancin farashi da aiki mai sauri amma mafi girman haɗari gaba ɗaya. Hatta a tsakanin masu haɓaka Ethereum, zaɓin zama a kan 'mainnet' ana ganinsa a matsayin hanya mafi dacewa akai-akai.

Irin waɗannan ƙa'idodin suna aiki ga manyan hanyoyin masana'antu. Hanyoyin magancewa da ke neman sarrafa ayyukan hanyar sadarwa ta TRON ta atomatik don kasuwanci suna ganin ƙarin buƙata a tsakanin ƙungiyoyin da ba sa son keɓance sarrafa Energy ɗin su, sarrafa Smart Mode da Host Mode da kansu, ko ɓata lokaci a kan rubuta code da sarrafa API. Netts Workspace yana ba da sauƙin amfani da ke haɗa Energy rental, Smart Mode da Host Mode, hada-hadar TRON da sarrafa Energy, kayan aikin sa ido, binciken AML, da ayyukan kuɗi, yana barin kamfanoni su rage farashi yayin da suke rage haɗarin da ke tattare da ayyukan hannu.